Killing Us Softly: The Global Depopulation Policy Paperback – April 28, 2014

Overpopulation is killing this planet. Only a fool can't see it. the only question is what shall be done to deal with it? If you think the powers that be are sitting around smoking cigars and watching world go by, you, would be wrong. Very wrong. All the power brokers you know, and hundreds you don't, are working hard, very hard to depopulate the planet. It's not a question if they will, but when. And how. My bet: an engineered virus. The "Novel" Corona Bat Virus was THE test. You sheeple bought into it, hook, line and sinker. 90% of this planets inhabitants will perish sooner then you think. And you will help them accomplish that goal with your apathy and ignorance. Consider yourselves been warned.

I don't agre with everything the author states, particularly not the solutions to the problems he adresses. But the book is definitely worth reading.

I commend the author for tackling this suppressed topic & the book is well written. I disagree with his assumption that the reason for this conspiracy is population control. This is possible, but there are holes in his case. For example, and I'm not a vegan, but see the documentary 'Cowspiracy' & it will make you question why, if the world elite are so concerned for the environment, they leave the meat industry alone, not to mention oil companies. He might also have mentioned the hypocrisy of elites like Ted Turner, with I believe 5 children, their private jets, multiple mansions, etc. The author takes it as a given that overpopulation is destroying the environment, so much so that he fails to examine other motives, like eugenics. He appears to trust that the elite is doing something that's necessary for our survival, but fails to present any evidence that is so. So I agree with his conclusions that a soft kill genocide is probably occurring, but not his explanation of it.

Someone who see's the truth!

I am speechless, rated this five stars. This is not the first person I heard this from, other whistle blowers are leaking this information. What happened in Flint Michigan, why did they switch to poison water? Why is the cancer rate so high now? I received the book as a gift.

Who do you think caused overgrowth of population? They same group of people who are trying to now control it. The UN was not designed for good. The presidents along with the Vatican haven't held down the fort up until a certain point, they're in on it. It has to be understood that a population problem was created to manifest a reaction from the world, the governments and the religious arenas so that they could supply their solution (to the problem they created). Agreed that population has been inflated in very poor and under-developed areas. Yet the 1st world populations are declining, for years. The only reason many first world countries have increased is immigration. But if you were to research the efforts of the UN and prior, the WHO and even certain "benevolent" groups their efforts are minimal or even false in providing education to these areas about birth control. The policy of depopulation was designed well before a population problem existed. They were waiting for the population to be a problem to use it. For a very long time and even now, we are not necessarily overpopulated, but mismanaged. And if educated, we can make corrections. The solutions presented at the end of the book are not solutions. They are reactions of the psychosocial brainwashing that was driven into the you, the writer in the 70-80's.

Well I heard this guy on the Power Hour on April 8. While he started off just fine he quickly turned toward the end of the interview. He stated that everyone should work until 70 years old and then be assisted in suicide to remove them from using up resources that are needed for the worker people. No retirement, no golden years. Work until you die or assisted death. Not the American Dream that we have always been taught and that brings everyone to the USA. After hearing that interview I have no interest in reading anything this guy writes. Is there a negative star that can be given?!

Who is this guy? Up front, I'll admit, I tried to get through this but finally gave up in disgust after 16 pages. Out of morbid curiosity, I skipped to the conclusion to see if there was any point in trying to get any further, and there was not. He accepts as givens certain concepts that range from contested and unproven (climate change) to completely discredited (overpopulation). Apparently he doesn't realize that Ehrlich and Malthus were provably wrong. He needs to study basic logic and argumentation, because he can't put a logical argument together, and watching him try is very painful. Perhaps even stranger, he discusses the terrible evils perpetrated on all of us by the ruling elite ... and then telling us we should be thankful for their efforts. This author isn't quite all there. His final conclusion is basically - we only have three alternatives - (1) nuclear war, (2) mass chaos and murder, or (3) taking the world to a brand new level of tyranny by forcing population control and reductions on the world. He doesn't have a problem with mass removals of the population and coercive programs that enforce this; he is just upset they are not overt and 'legal.' Then again, given bad premises and faulty logic, should it really be surprising that the conclusions are ludicrous?