GA-510 10W Ham Radio Handheld, Dual Band Two Way Radio | Long Range, Tri-Power, with Two 2200mAh Batteries & Programming Cable, CHIRP Compatible, for Outdoor Camping Security Hunting

I bought the the Radioddity GA-510 after watching several Youtube videos detailing its performance. The performance from this radio is really good. It quickly become one of my favorite budget-friendly dual handheld radios. For the price, it delivers a lot of performance and features packed into a rugged, compact unit. ✅ High Power Output: The 10-watt output is no joke. I’ve noticed a clear improvement in both transmission range and signal strength compared to my older 5W radios. It easily hits local repeaters and performs well even in more challenging environments. ✅ Dual-Band Functionality: It covers both UHF and VHF bands (136-174MHz & 400-520MHz), making it a great all-purpose radio for ham use, monitoring, and general communications. ✅ Clear Audio & Loud Speaker: Audio quality is crisp, and the built-in speaker gets loud enough to hear even in busy environments like construction sites or outdoors with wind. ✅ Long Battery Life: The 2200mAh battery holds up great. I’ve gotten a full day of use on a single charge with moderate transmitting and receiving. It also charges via USB-C, which is super convenient. ✅ Well-Built & Compact: It feels durable in the hand, with a rugged design that inspires confidence. The size is just right—not too bulky, but not too small either. 📌 Things to know before buying: This is a Ham dual band 2m/70cm radio. It’s not FCC-certified for GMRS or commercial use—best suited for licensed ham operators. You will need a Ham license in order to Tx with this radio. This will require you to study and take a test. There are many resources to help you with this (Hamstudy.org). Rx doesn't cost you anything. You can Rx all you want, just to push the Tx button (PTT) without a license or the ham police will find you. :) Final Thoughts: The Radioddity GA-510 is a great choice for ham radio operators who want more power in a compact, budget-friendly package. It’s reliable, tough, and packed with features usually found on more expensive models. Highly recommended!

How's that for a dramatic headline? It's true: this is *not* a 10-watt transceiver! All tests on Youtube and QST magazine show it's only 8 watts. But you actually don't want any more than 8 watts pouring into your brain and eyeballs when you transmit, and this HT's competition radios are all 8 watts, too. I decided on the dramatic headline though, because these Chinese manufacturers need to learn that it is *not* acceptable to make such false and inflated claims, if they want to participate in the US market. That's the bad news. For the good news, let's have a quick word about those QST magazine tests: though the 10-watt claims are false, they revealed that this HT is now the first Baofeng-class, wideband VHF/UHF transceiver that truly meets the FCC-required -60 dB spurious emissions requirement! This one is actually legal to use on the ham bands! Radioddity has apparently worked with the Chinese factory to include proper RF filtering, so it can now be a serious, non-polluting amateur radio handheld, with a full 8 watts of output. So this is the one you want. This one is the UV-5R killer we've all been waiting for. Other improvements over the UV-5R include: • More verbose menu names and options, at least for the important ones, so we can configure a repeater on-the-fly while traveling without needing cheat sheets for the menu options. • We don't need to write the transmit config into a memory separately from the receive config; both are written when we commit a configuration to memory. • More characters in the display. • The alarm button is now a tiny dot on the top of the unit, next to the antenna, where it's less likely to be pressed by accident. • The useless LED "flashlight" (and its wrongly-named button) have been removed. • The size makes it feel more secure to grip, and the buttons are now larger for easier operation. Other positives about this radio: • Nice loud speaker, and good reports on audio quality from other repeater users. •The tough plastic case and battery feel very rugged. • It has the same belt clip as the UV-5R, which I like for its ease of clipping/unclipping, while remaining secure on the belt when I want it to stay put. • It is still a "general-purpose" FM transceiver, which means hams can carry a single HT and still be able to communicate with FRS/GMRS/MURS/business-band users. (Shh, don't tell! This isn't in compliance with FRS/GMRS regulations, but a nice feature nonetheless.) • Compatible with de-facto standards, like Chirp software, Kenwood/Baofeng-style accessories, and CTCSS/DCS tones (including separate tone freqs for transmit and receive). • And let me reiterate: this puts out a full 8 watts with *none* of the usual Baofeng "splatter" and spectral pollution! It's a real radio, at Chinese-made prices, at long last! Here are some opportunities for improvement: • Scanning is incredibly slow, and does not let us exclude channels from the scan list. So, if we want to use the scan function, we can't dedicate a memory to the NOAA weather radio channel; it will annoy us quickly by stopping on that channel on every scan. • The left/right arrow keys do nothing. They should be omitted entirely from the next revision of this radio. • The manual still has lots of room for improvement. Hey Radioddity, what does menu option #14, "FHSS," do? By omitting it from your menu reference, you got the numbers of all the subsequent menu options wrong. • The cover over the speaker/mic jacks opens downward, rather than rearward, which means it dangles out in harm's way when a speaker/mic is attached. The UV-5R cover was lower-profile when open. But aside from the scanning feature being almost useless, the other drawbacks are pretty small, right? I'm excited about that. This radio is it. This is the one to buy for your kids when they earn their technician licenses, or to keep in your day pack while camping, off-roading, or geocaching. The price is good, the power level is good, the audio is good, the ergonomics are good, and—okay, I'm going to say it one more time!—it actually meets the FCC requirement for -60 dB spurious emissions. With Radioddity's help, the Chinese have finally arrived, with a solid, rugged radio that we can recommend unapologetically. So, what's next, Radioddity? How about a waterproof version? How about an "S" version with no display or keys? How about an update to the GD-77 with 8 watts output and no "splatter?" With this GA-510, I see they're moving in the right direction, becoming more "serious" contributors, improving quality with new products, and ultimately, they deserve more of my money for it.

This Radioddity transceiver was a second choice, but a serviceable one. It programs easily with CHIRP, and hits repeaters about as well as other similar small handheld radios. The menus are OK, similar to other low-end radios, and better than some. It feels solid in the hand, gives good audio and got no complaints on its transmitted sound in the few QSOs I did with it. It was a gift from my wife to one of her friends who had recently gotten her Technician amateur radio license, so my experience with it was limited to programming it with a starting roster of local and regional repeaters, and testing it to see that it indeed hit many of them. This last it did, including some fairly distant ones, though there were times when a older smaller inexpensive radio reached a distant repeater that this one would not reach reliably. Its reception seemed quite good, but there were a few times it came in slightly second-best there too. In fairness, it was the better of the two in a few cases as well. Minor differences in antennas and squelch settings, etc., could account for these marginal differences. Programming with CHIRP, which I used in preference to the dedicated software so as to easily share the programming between it and other HTs I own that CHIRP can also program, was for the most part easy and predictable, as CHIRP usually is. An exception was with a repeater that needed a digital code (DPL) rather than a tone (CTCSS) to access. The problem turned out to be that with DPL, the radio was requiring the same code back from the repeater to break squelch, which the repeater did not transmit. The exact same programming for other repeaters with a tone did not require the tone transmitted back. This may have been a CHIRP issue, as I saw it on another HT, programmed with the same set of channels. The key was to use a combined mode that specified both TX and RX code, with expressly no RX code. Oddly, CHIRP does not allow this for all HTs it programs, and for one I had to make the change after programming, using the radio keyboard menu. I don't recall this before, so it may have been a change in CHIRP, which I had recently refreshed with a current version. It lacks a few minor useful interface features such as "locked" name and frequency display, so that both are seen together when in channel mode, and other minor features that are not missed unless one is used to them. Its menus and features are still better than some competitors. I liked easily cycling through the power settings using a dedicated side key. Reversing a repeater's frequencies was a one-key operation, as was starting scanning. Scanning worked well, and noisy or talkative channels could be bypassed (and scan direction reversed) from the keyboard (up/down arrows). One could program scan skip channels, but I saw no way to forbid transmit on channels intended only to be monitored (like the NOAA weather radio channels). Like I said, a good selection of features, but not an exhaustive set. It can receive (and transmit on, though the legality there is technically questionable) both FRS/GMRS and MURS frequencies. I wanted a new HT myself, but decided not to purchase one of these for myself, and perhaps wait for a usable version of a more capable three-band radio in the same price range. The story there is that the other radio, which I really liked and was my first choice as the gift, had a fatal flaw - on 2 meters (around 146 MHz) it emitted a huge amount of spurious radiation, on harmonics and other frequencies, at power levels rivaling or exceeding the main signal!!! After trying three of those radios (two from Amazon, one from the supplier's warehouse) and finding the same problem in all, I came to the conclusion that there was a bad batch from the manufacturer. I was going to review it to warn other buyers, but its listing has been removed from Amazon, for whatever reason. Needless to say, I tested this Radioddity for spectral purity, and though I cannot guarantee that my sample met FCC requirements, my simple instruments show that it was at least close. The included programming cable was one of the common type with a Prolific interface chip, requiring installation of a specific driver to work. If buying the cable alone, for a couple of dollars more, a cable with the FTDI chip, for which Windows will automatically load the correct driver, is a better alternative. As this was a gift, I bought a separate verified FTDI cable and swapped out the included Prolific, which I kept as a backup. Note that there is no included easy method of charging the batteries using USB or 12V automotive power. I believe a separate USB to 10V adapter cable sold for use with another radio might work, but some careful testing would be necessary to obtain an easy on-the-go charging solution. The batteries do not appear to be a common type, so may be hard to find. Fortunately, two are supplied. So this is a nice solid radio, with two batteries, a charging stand, and a usable, if slightly inconvenient, programming cable included - everything needed to get a good start for a first, or a backup, 2 meter / 70 cm handheld FM ham transceiver. A very solid 4 stars, good value for the price, and recommended. Oh, and what radio did I end up getting myself? I decided that if I was going to get a new radio, it might was well include some really new features beyond my old Chinese analog HTs (new bands or modes, etc.). I ended up with a DMR radio, which of course can also do the same analog FM repeaters and simplex that this Radioddity does. Radioddity makes a serviceable DMR HT, but I went with another brand that I will review in due course, after completely surmounting the learning curve of code plugs and DMR features!

Update Aug 17, 2024: My second complaint is that the volume knob turns very easily. When I put the radio in my pocket the volume will get changed either all the way up or all the way down. I contacted Radioddity about this and they have no solution, or seemingly no concern other than to return the radio. I ended up with a fix where I put a small rubber O-ring around the volume knob at it's base. This gives added friction to turning the knob and by selecting just the right size O-ring it works pretty well...not too loose not to tight. So I'll keep the radio despite these two annoyances. Original review: I bought this radio to use as a cheap dual band ham, GMRS and to receive local fire traffic. The speaker is good, maybe not great but better than my older Yaesu 2m circa 2005. Using CHIRP to program is great and all radios should be compatible with CHIRP. It has only 128 memories which is small by today's standards but I've only used half of them and have filled in everything that I can think of for now. Getting a spare battery is a plus. The charger: well, it's a classic desk charger (with a light that is tooo bright, I put a piece of tape on it's bright center, now it's fine). No USB charging as this radio seems to have been designed in 2019 based on the FCC filings. I was concerned that it uses a now obsolete chip and maybe it does, but it's RX sensitivity is just as good, no better, than my older Yaesu dedicated 2m talkie. So this is fine for me. Are there more sensitive radios out there, maybe, but for some $40 this is a no brainer radio. My only complaint so far is that the little tab things on the bottom that allow the radio to stand on a desk are too close to each other. yes it does stand upright, but wobbles a little when I set it down until it stabilizes. But it's rather thin (1/2 that of above mentioned talkie) and very light with good speaker and decent display. What else does one need in this price range. Oh, I did find that the antenna is rather stiff which I don't like in a talkie as that means a lot of stress on the SMA connector when the antenna is stressed. I ordered a brandX dual band antenna that is more flexible and will do side by side comparison on performance. In the end this is a rather older design clearly, but has modern software, a good speaker and is mechanically better designed than many others I've seen out there. Update after 6 months: the generic dual band more flexible antenna I bought turns out to be terrible at 2m band. So I've gone back to the Radioddity OEM antenna despite it being rather stiff. I've found that dual band talkie antennas fall into two types: 1- fairly well designed with an internal structure that requires them to be stiff; 2- a bottom end fed flexible whip that has tuning at the bottom for both bands. The later type is terrible inefficient as the radiating whip is just toooo short for 2m. The former works better, if you don't break it or the radio's connector from stress on the antenna. I transport the radio with the antenna off and put it on to use it and the treat it carefully. Not that I think the radio or antenna are fragile mind you, it's just that should the radio's connector get damaged it's lights-out for the whole radio. As for the radio after 6 months ownership: it's fine, not great, not bad, but definitely light and with long battery life. I still recommend this radio.

I love how stout and well built this this radio is. especially next to other sub-$50-75 units. The radio is Chirp-friendly, and this feature makes it so easy to load and unload frequencies, settings, and other data. This radio was an easy decision for me, and I highly recommend it.

Update on the Update: Desk charger failed. Shows red when battery in dock, battery does not charge, light never goes green. Nine months out from purchase, radio actually used a handful of times due to horrible receive performance. "Support window closed" when trying to contact Radioddity. Pure junk. Update: I bought this as a backup radio and in initial testing, performance was good. My main attraction was the best-in-class display which was easy on my aging eyes. However, when I actually started using the radio, it's weaknesses became apparent. Transmit audio is good, but receive audio is worse than ever... Crackling and full of static unless you're right on top of the transmitting station. More than a two miles from a repeater, the radio is unusable. Duck, base or mobile antenna makes no difference. Replaced it with a Baofeng GT-5R from Radioddity. Despite the lame Baofeng display, the GT-5R is superior to the GA-510 in every relevant way... Performance and build quality. Skip the GA-510. I bought this as a backup radio, not a daily carry. Performance is very good. Receive tends to be prone to overload, and receive audio through the internal speaker is somewhat tinny and weak. Transmit audio is crystal clear resulting it top notch signal reports. Recharge times are faster than expected. Battery life is excellent. The "paper white" LCD display is best in class, and light years ahead of competitive Chinese radios. Build quality is exceptionally solid and results in a very impressive little radio for the money. On the bench, output is clean and clear with no splatter or troublesome harmonics. Far cleaner than the UV-5R, UV-82, and UV-82 I used as baseline comparisons. About the same as my TYT UV-8000D and TYT MD-390 in terms of signal purity. No worse than my Yaesu FT-60R. Pros: Paper white LCD display is clean and clear with large, clear fonts. Very easy to read under any conditions. As I said, best in class. Radio is compact and solid, and feels good in your hand. Very durable materials and build quality. Transmit audio is top notch, Recharges fast and has better than expected battery life. Cons: Receive audio is weak and tinny, comparable to a Baofeng UV-5R. Receiver could use better filtering. Summary: This is a great little radio for field use. Averages 7.5 watts on both bands. Good clean transmitted signal. Receive audio is probably not the best choice for noisy environments. All in all, I'm glad I added it to my collection. A great value for the money.

I bought this as an upgrade to my Baofeng UV-5RE. If i have one complaint it's that the backlight of the LCD screen is way too bright. Not enough to really downgrade it, but something maybe the manufacturer can address in future versions of this radio. the sound quality is quite an improvement over the 5RE... it feels better built in hand, and the battery life is more than acceptable for a days use. It does come with 2 batteries so if you do use your radio a lot over the course of a day, you always have the second battery to fall back on while the other recharges... The antenna, is your typical low cost rubber duck type which is about as good as any of them. It works, but upgrading to one of the Nagoya 7xx series will improve performance 10 fold... Overall, solid radio and it does work with CHIRP... so programming it is as easy as using CHIRP...

Comparisons are easy to come by when reviewing this product. I have another Handheld transceiver that I have been using for a number of years without incident or complaints. I bought the Radioddity GA 510 as a backup. Its inexpensive cost was of course a factor, but also the purported fact that it could transmit 10 watts, twice the power of my other HT. The unit arrived with two batteries which is a plus, and after some use they seem to hold their charge well after some use. In that respect the unit is as good as my other one. Now, here comes my gripes which will probably echo other hams -- both experienced and novices. The programming system is somewhat complex (and we are fair-warned in the manual). Complex is probably not the right word, as struggle, frustration, doubt, regret, discouragement, deception, and other descriptives wrapped up in one best describe my interface with this product. However, I tend to see myself as a problem solver and committed myself to solving the convoluted design of this HT. One has to get into the mind of those that conceived this product. The Manual? Well, one might not call it that, as it is no more than a brief summary of how the HT works. It has a chapter, for example, how to program the frequencies, but only in the briefest terms and then refers you to another chapter where more information can be found. Turning to that chapter is useless because not only does it not give you the details you need to program and retrieve the frequencies, it will refer you to another equally useless chapter. The manual is not up to date. The settings in the menu no longer refer to the same settings on the unit. The writers of the manual have inserted a function after menu item #13 which is not reflected in the unit, which means that all the menu settings mentioned after that are one digit more. I am still struggling with menu settings so that I can retrieve the frequencies I have programmed. My major concern and question is, even given the complexity programming, why didn't the writers of the manual write one that was useful and user friendly, like other manufactures such as Yaesu have done. The latter's manuals are clear and understandable to the point that even a novice (I am not a novice!) can understand and follow. I don't understand why the manufacturer didn't spend a few dollars (!) to have an experienced ham write the manual If they had, this review might be totally different. Perhaps an enterprising Ham will take up the project and produce one that will save us from anxiety. On the Plus side, the unit seems to be well constructed with quality materials, not equal to Yaesu's products but good enough for general use. For a small unit the sound is excellent, the reception as well, though I have not tested yet its reach. Physical design is up to Ham standards and comes with a useful belt clip. I've made a couple of local contacts with repeaters, and my reported signal was positive. There you have it. Basically a decent HT with a crummy manual.

llego sin Antena. y no se pudo probar