📷 Snap, Share, Shine!
The Sony Alpha A230L is a 10.2 MP digital SLR camera designed for photography enthusiasts. It features a high-quality APS-size CCD image sensor, SteadyShot INSIDE image stabilization, and an 18-55mm standard zoom lens, making it perfect for capturing detailed images in various settings. The camera also includes a 2.7-inch Clear Photo LCD Plus display and supports multiple memory card formats for flexible storage solutions.
S**S
Roughly as good as can be expected.
My title is rather pessimistic, I know, but I've been playing with this camera now for a couple of hours, so I've had a chance to get a feel for what consumers are going to probably like, and not like, about this lens kit.First, if you are a serious photographer, you are going to be better off buying the body of this camera separately from the lens. It isn't that the 18-55mm, 3.5-5.6 aperture lens is bad: it just isn't great for inside work, as far as I can tell. The kind of "meh" aperture range means you'll struggle a bit in "normal" indoor lighting to get hand-held shots that don't really want flash, and the problem with the flash is it is straight-ahead flash, so that your attempts at head shots are going to potentially have a deer-in-the-headlights quality about them. This will be because even zoomed in to 55mm, you're going to need to be close to a subject for a portrait shot--closer than you really would like to be. Getting the two-lens kit, for a couple hundred dollars more, might be a really good alternative here, because I think the longer telephoto in that kit can go out to 200mm, giving you more flexibility in where you need to stand for shots. I was pretty sure when purchasing the kit that I was going to quickly need a really solid prime to go with it, and the Sony 50mm f 1.4 has already proven itself a valuable addition.The good news is that, aside from the "adequate-but-kind-of-meh" lens, everything else on this thing mostly rocks! I was a bit nervous because I had seen other reviews in which some reviewers chewed on the ergonomics a bit, but I'm not really finding that to be a problem so far. The battery door, the door to the memory cards, etc., are rigid and open happily and confidently. As far as the battery goes, my advice would be to pick up an extra battery, because after charging mine the first time, I was down to roughly half power without having taken that many photos (maybe 75 RAW out of what I was being told was a 500-image total available. I didn't expect the battery to make it for 500 shots, but it looks like I would have gotten about 150 shots out of the charge, and I can definitely see situations where a photographer would run into trouble from that.)One thing that may not be immediately obvious from pictures is that the right-hand grip is quite comfortable, and there is a design feature on the back (basically a bit of a "hump" that provides the right thumb a place to get a kind of secure purchase so that you really shouldn't ever feel like the camera is in danger of slipping out of your hand. I always put my left hand under the bottom of a camera anyway, so that I can adjust the focus ring easily, and even though this camera and its lenses have auto-focus, that's still a comfortable place for the left hand.Many of the features and details of the camera are things that you can find in other reviews or in detail lists for this product, so I won't repeat all of that. I will state that I had no problems with the placement of the shutter button. I had seen some criticism on line suggesting that the reviewer felt like he was putting a lot of stress on a couple of fingers while firing the shutter button, but I really just didn't find that to be the case.All of the controls are really pretty intuitive. I turned the feature off that shows the pictures of what various things mean. If you are stepping up to a SLR from a point-and-shoot, do yourself a favor and learn what aperture is, and white balance. The joy of this camera is taking a photo with "automatic" settings, and then going to manual, taking the same shot, and realizing how completely screwed up your own sense of the shot is! <smile> Actually, this is kind of valuable, in that the digital nature of the camera means that you (and I) can get a real lesson about what happens when changing aperture or shutter speed, even sometimes by very small amounts.In many ways, this camera is an ideal camera for a serious hobbyist (I'm not going to go hyperbolic and say "professional," because the limitations of this camera are the sort that wouldn't be tolerated by a professional being pushed to the limits of digital photography. It isn't that a professional shot can't be taken on this camera, but that there are digital bodies that would make a professional's life much easier than the a230 would).It is going to pretty much meet all of my needs for awhile, at least with the better lens on the front, and maybe a really good zoom to give me a bit more range of options.The build quality seems fine to me. Nothing is jiggling. Lenses go on and off with no problems. Definitely buy the LCD cover that's available from Amazon. Otherwise, you'll discover that basically everything smudges the LCD display. It isn't the end of the world, but your nose will constantly be pressed against the display, so there will always be a bit of oil and moisture smudged on, otherwise.This isn't a bad camera at all, and if you are JUST looking for a system that will give you some flexibility to take "normal" shots of the variety that other people make you sit through after they've fed you dinner, then you are going to be immediately happy. The camera will do many of the things that you need for it to do automatically, and can easily take better shots than you would take, if you knew nothing or little about photography, and had no interest to learn. But like many things, if you DO know something about photography, you will be pleasantly surprised about the sorts of things that you CAN do with this rig, as long as you are willing to make an investment in accessories that will give the body a chance to show its stuff.
P**O
Awesome
This is just what I was looking for perfect
A**S
Good seller - Good product - Great shipping
I recieved this camera with everything including the box, manual, lens, lens cap and accessories. The battery even came half charged, not drained, so I wouldn't have to spend hours charging it. I could use it right away. I used my own memory stick but that's okay because it was stated as such in the original description. The shipping was great it reached me quicker than expected, less than a week including weekends. There were no defects. There were no scratches or scrapes. The camera was clean as if the pre-owned camera was used once or twice and put back in the box.If you're looking for a slim, pocket sized camera, this is not for you. This camera is something you will definitely be hanging from your shoulder or in a bag. Compared to the non DSLR Nikon L100, in size, the Sony A230 is slightly bulkier but not heavier, I own both. The basic 18-55mm lens that comes with it is nice for close shots but if you're looking for a 15x like the Nikon L100 or higher camera you'll have to buy a better lens. The options are okay. The photo does not show on the display until you take it, rather the display shows options or stats. You look through the lens to zoom in and out via lens. I really like the picture quality. Of the 500 pictures I've taken in the past month, not one comes out blurry. Auto and Manual, changable lens and photo delay are a plus. I like the rechargable battery concept, very portable and wireless to charge.There's probably other things I missed in the review. The only flaw I could think of is that when you click for one second and it flashes but does not take a picture, you have to hold it for a second or two as oppose to taking it right away, I reset the settings and much better and it got better. It's a nice entry level DSLR. I like it because it takes really clear pictures, again entry level photographers go for it. The alternative was the Nikon D3000 but I couldn't find a review that gave a huge difference between the two. This coming from a Techie by trade not a photographer.
S**H
The right fit for me
Right before Minolta was sold to Sony I purchased a digital Maxxum Dynax 7D. It is a nice camera but all those bells and whistles were a bit too complicated for me and because of the weight I almost always had to use a tripod which I really don't like lugging around or taking the time to set up. Mostly I would use my small point and shoot camera and leave the big 7D at home if I went out to take photos.One day I was at the local Farmers market and there was a couple there selling their photos. I stopped and talked to them and that's when I found out about the new line of Digital SLR cameras Sony was putting out. The wife had a new Sony Alpha 100 and was nice enough to let me play around with it. I was pretty well sold on a Sony after that but at that time just didn't have the money to spare.Now I'm glad I waited to buy a Sony Alpha because since that time at the Farmers Market there's more to choose from and I like the Sony Alpha A230L better than the Sony Alpha A100 because it's simpler and lighter.Oh, I have to mention another big plus is that I didn't have to buy new lenses because I can use my Minolta lenses! The one that came with it is very nice though so I might consider buying a couple of Sony lenses too.So for me, this camera is every thing I've been looking for. It's light, easy to use, easy to hold with my small hand, takes great photos and didn't hurt the pocket book either because Amazon.com had a great deal!
Trustpilot
2 weeks ago
5 days ago