

🩳 Elevate your essentials: where comfort meets confidence.
Jockey Men's Underwear Pouch Brief 3-Pack combines 97% breathable cotton with 3% Lycra spandex for a high-stretch, full-rise fit. Designed with a horizontal fly and supportive pouch, these briefs offer superior comfort and coverage. Machine washable and durable, this 3-pack is a must-have for professionals seeking reliable everyday underwear that balances function and style.
























| ASIN | B0817QFJ9N |
| Additional Features | Tag Free |
| Age Range Description | Adult |
| Best Sellers Rank | #59,546 in Clothing, Shoes & Jewelry ( See Top 100 in Clothing, Shoes & Jewelry ) #52 in Men's Underwear Briefs |
| Bottom Style | Briefs |
| Brand Name | Jockey |
| Care instructions | Machine Wash |
| Color | Black |
| Customer Reviews | 4.2 out of 5 stars 2,658 Reviews |
| Fabric Type | 97% Cotton, 3% Lycra Spandex |
| Fabric type | 97% Cotton, 3% Lycra Spandex |
| Item Weight | 0.46 Pounds |
| Manufacturer | Jockey |
| Manufacturer Part Number | 100149118 |
| Material Type | Cotton, Spandex |
| Pattern | Solid |
| Product Care Instructions | Machine Wash |
| Rise Style | Full |
| Size | Medium |
| Style Name | 1145 |
| Style Number | 100149118 |
| UPC | 194490048533 |
| Unit Count | 3 Count |
R**G
Perfect Fit and Function — Exactly What I Wanted
I’ve seen some negative reviews about the high rise on these briefs, but honestly, that’s exactly what I was looking for — and these Jockey briefs fit the bill. Yes, they are truly full rise (I’m 6’2”, 205 lbs, wearing a size Large), and they sit high, as advertised. That’s part of what makes them so comfortable and supportive. The pouch design is excellent — supportive without being restrictive, and it adds a level of comfort that’s hard to find in most standard briefs. One note on sizing: in my opinion, Jockey runs a bit small, so I’d recommend sizing up if you’re on the fence. I’ve included photos showing the fit on a real person, as I find this gives a clearer sense of sizing, coverage, and rise than stock images alone
D**D
Good underwear
Great fit with good room!
W**I
They need to make the in-between sizes
These are the best underwear I’ve ever owned, but the sizes irritate me. I wear a 38 inch waist. The large fit 36–38 waist and they are uncomfortably constricting. They don’t make a 38–40. When I buy the X-large, they fit a 40–42 waist and feel like I’m wearing somebody else’s underwear.
G**N
Kangaroo pockets!
I am going to give you a comparison between Jockey & Munsingerwear briefs. I have worn Munsinger Wear briefs for many years because I really prefer the kangaroo pocket over the side pockets. The pairs I currently have were getting old, so I went looking to purchase more. Apparently the grey and black colors are no longer available, and I prefer them because they don't show stains as much as the white briefs do. SO, the only decent and reasonably priced alternative was the Jockey brief with the kangaroo pouch. Notice in the picture how they compare. Both sizes are XL. The waists were the same - 33.5", but the Jockey felt a little tighter probably because of a little wider waist band and heavier material. The pocket on Jockey was 4" wide compared to 5" wide on the Munsingerwear. And the distance from the waist band to the top of the kangaroo pocket was 6.5" for the Jockey and only 4.5" for the Musingerwear. The length from the top of the waist band to the bottom of the briefs was 16" on the Jockey, and 13" on Munsingerwear. Some previous reviews complained about that. I found it didn't make much difference for me since I prefer loose fitting briefs. The Jockey waist band is about an eighth inch wider. While I like the older style Munsingerwear colored briefs a little better than the new Jockey briefs, I find both of them to be comfortable and suitable to my needs. I'm 6'2" tall and about 39" under my belly where I wear the briefs. Jockey stretches just fine, but do seem to be tighter than my older ones, but certainly not uncomfortable. I don't have any problem with the waist band curling over - and it should with my current "build". I hope this review helps some of you. I will certainly purchase again if I need anymore before I die. I expect to get several years of wear (3-6 years, maybe more) of of these Jockey briefs. That's what Munsingerwear has done for me, and Jockey seems to be every bit the same or better quality. The packages I received were made in Cambodia.
T**M
good fit
great
D**M
When you buy clothes made in Asia, going two sizes oer is not enough
First problem is the size. Clothes made over there in Asia are suitable for children's dolls in America. I knew that but I believed they were telling the truth about the size since these expressed it in inches = 32-34 - not cm. But they lied. They are tight, but the pouch is big enough for me so I wear them. Second lie was that they are cotton. They are made of elastic material so they cling to you. I am not big. And after showering when I stretch these things over my small, average frame they stick to my skin. Also, they rip easily, because they are not really cotton and I am not really strong as I once was, but I tried to stretch the dam leg hole wider and the material tore apart.
T**R
These are made out of stretch material you might need to have to get a larger size
Well made
A**L
Tight but Tall
These are the weirdest underwear that I've ever tried on. I'm about 5'7" tall, 170 lbs, and always get a good fit from other brands with a size L. So I ordered these in size L as well, but the fit is ridiculous. They are quite tight all over but the foolish things come up to my navel. Now who the heck has a body made for these skivvies?
A**R
Excellent quality
Good fit. Like the pocket
F**N
Je recommande
Slip kangourou au style très particulier, avec une poche très fonctionnelle et qui monte très haute. Parfait
A**T
Excelente opción
Muy práctico 😃👏
A**B
Great item
It's frustrating that Jockey don't sell the pouch H front underwear in the UK. These are quality underpants, fit well and very pleased with my order. The delivery time was awesome arriving a week ahead of schedule!
T**O
Largest size available at $21.99 price point is XL
Just noticed these listed on Amazon Canada for $21.99 (3 pack) for up to and including size XL. Until now I have been buying size 2XL (3 pack) and these have been exceptional both for comfort and fit. Will see how the XL size works out. Pricing makes no sense but I'm just happy these are available. Since we "lost" Sears and Target here in Canada shopping for bare essentials (excuse the pun) outside the major cities is a nightmare.
Trustpilot
2 weeks ago
1 month ago