5 Channel Rack Mount Bluetooth Amplifier Receiver - 200 Watt Home Theater Amp, Bluetooth Wireless Streaming, MP3/USB/SD/AUX, Digital ID3 LCD Display - PDA7BU.5

This works great for our living room!

Very easy to hook up , user friendly and sounds great

My wife went off the pill and done had another kid. Supposedly mine. Well, adding a baby to the house, I lost my studio. Built on a new room and I decided to upgrade to some better speakers. Truth be told, I'm super cheap though, so I picked up some decent speakers off of FB Marketplace for $35 and a powered sub to match. Bought this amp to run the speakers and boy am I impressed. Well built and with some great features for the price. I can crank the system up loud enough to down out the tantrum screaming of my alleged children. I like how it has a rack mount option as well. It really makes me feel like a real musician listening to my techno folk creations off of Soundcloud.

Works great and Bluetooth has solid connection

How is it acceptable to sell a "rack mount" amplifier that can't be rack mounted? What kind of product manager would approve this insanity? It ships with four feet attached internally to the device. These are clearly problematic right off the bat for rack mounting. A rack "U" is a static measurement that never changes. The solution on the manufacturer's website to make this device, advertised as rack mountable, actually rack mountable, you must remove the feet yourself. Fine, I guess. ...only you can't remove the feet at all unless you completely dissemble the device. Not just a few screws -- we're talking over 10 screws of multiple different threads and lengths, and depending on how you do it, someone could waste even more time removing the knobs and retaining nuts since two of the screws are hidden underneath circuit boards. Another 16 pieces of hardware to remove. It is ludicrous that the official recommendation of the manufacturer to make their device work as advertised is to fully disassemble it. But, I stuck it out and did it anyway. ...but then the screws on the underside are not inset and they stick out, clearly exceeding the static dimensions of a rack U and are unprotected by the front plate like the top screws are. This causes the amplifier to scratch the device underneath. Damaging neighboring devices is somehow acceptable to Pyle. We're now at the second different reason why a device advertised as rack mountable is not rack mountable. The whole point of a rack mountable device is to live within the constraints of a rack with devices that operate with other devices on top or below it. So, I removed the screws, which caused the device to lose its rigidity, but I did it anyway because it won't be moved much. ...but next is the third flaw, and this one is fatal: the rack ears don't even align to a rack! We're not talking a matter of a 1U device extending to 2Us -- they are literally spaced too far apart no matter how you vertically align them. Is it perhaps 1.5Us instead? Nope! They don't fit in-between Us, either. So here we have a "rack mountable" device, advertised as rack mountable, which can't actually be rack mounted for three completely different reasons. Genuinely impressive, Pyle. I went above and beyond to find a way to make it work. I should send them a bill.

This receiver worked out perfect , plenty of power , clear sound.

Has some heft to it and it's loud with my old huge speakers. I'll probably buy a larger one and use this for a bedroom TV stereo. Would buy again. UPDATE: Remote quit after 1 month, receiver lost one channel. Buying a Sony.

Pain in the butt to setup