Full description not available
M**3
Wonderfully written - should be required reading in schools
“From the Halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli, we fight our country’s battles in the air, on land and sea..” In this nifty new book, Brian Kilmeade and Don Yaeger tell the exciting story of how the US Marines earned bragging rights to include the shores of Tripoli in their hymn.Even before the Constitution was ratified and the United States of America came to official existence, the Barbary pirates were menacing our vessels. In summer 1785, the American Minister to France, Thomas Jefferson, received a letter from Richard O’Brien, captain of the Dauphin, which had been raided by Algerian pirates two weeks earlier. O’Brien and his crew had been captured and enslaved by the pirates and he was deploring their treatment to Jefferson. The true misery was yet to come. O’Brien would spend 10 years enslaved in Algiers and many of his men would succumb to disease, starvation and overwork. It seemed that was the only escape for any of them.It was not even two years since America had won their independence from Great Britain. That country and the rest of the world was waiting for the former colonies to fall on their faces. There were no bones to the American government as yet. Constitutional ratification was still three years away and George Washington’s presidency almost four years in the future. Besides the lack of political infrastructure, America had massive debt (the entire war was fought on borrowed money) and an economy that was in the terminal stage of anemia. It needed trade with southern Europe which unfortunately put American vessels directly in the path of the Barbary pirates. Great Britain, France, etc. paid surcharges to Tripoli, Algiers, Morocco, and Tunis to allow safe passage for their vessels. America not only did not have the money for that protection, it had no one authorized to provide it. Because we had no navy and nothing to threaten the pirates with, our insurance rate was about 20 times higher than the others.For Jefferson, this had a personal aspect as well. His beloved wife had died in 1782, and though he had their eldest daughter, 10-year-old Martha with him in Paris, he wanted to bring 6-year-old Polly over but was terrified of a pirate attack. He instructed his brother-in-law to send her only in a British or French vessel, as both nations paid hefty tributes for safety. Jefferson made a trip to London to confer with John Adams, United States minister to England, about the piracy issue. By this time it was several months after the capture of O’Brien and his men.Adams and Jefferson went to visit the envoy from Tripoli to discuss release of the captives. Exorbitant sums were discussed, with commissions going to the envoy as well as to other involved in the release. When Adams asked how the government of Tripoli could justify making war on nations which had done them no harm, the envoy replied: “All nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave.” All of the Muslims injured in such incidents were already in their places in paradise, he explained.The two old friends continued to debate the best approach for the new nation in this regard. Adams was for recommending payment of the bribes, that they simply could not go to war against the pirates. Jefferson argued that building a navy was the way to go, that in the long run it would cost less than paying bribes which were inconsistent and could go up at a moment’s notice. Additionally, the new country simply needed a navy to foster prestige. Still, the two men worked in concert to get O’Brien and his men freed, but nothing they tried succeeded. After five years, the men were still slaves.Jefferson returned home November 1789 to be greeted with the news that he had appointed Secretary of State by the new President, George Washington. Much had happened in the five years he had been away. Stunned, Jefferson was not sure about accepting the position and retreated to Monticello, where 17-year-old Martha was to be married that winter. After a few weeks, Jefferson decided to accept the position and traveled to the nation’s capital, New York City, to report for duty in March 1789. In his first meeting with Washington, the conversation included the plight of Richard O’Brien and his crew.Washington was a proponent of neutrality in international affairs and wanted neither a standing army or standing navy. Jefferson spent months preparing two reports to congress, one on O’Brien’s men and one on trade in the Mediterranean. During this time and the time that congress debated the reports, America’s economy was growing, more vessels were making their way to southern Europe. In October 1793 alone ten American vessels were captured, 110 men enslaved. Debate time was over – action was mandatory.The wheels of congress moved slowly as it began debates on the issue in February 1794. James Madison led the delegation against a navy, fearing it would expand the federal government’s influence and power. Others argued as Jefferson had that the cost of a navy was less than not having one and that the cost of maritime insurance was prohibitively expensive and increasingly almost daily. New England wanted the navy to protect their merchant vessels while the South did not support anything that increased federal power. Finally a compromise was reached to build or buy 6 ships but that construction of them would stop if peace were reached. It took three years before the first ship was launched. Meanwhile, the Barbary pirates continued their plundering. Jefferson had resigned and returned to Monticello a few months before the congressional debates began.Washington has another term, then John Adams serves four years before Jefferson takes on the presidency. Everything moved at a glacial pace at that time. People, even the president, would receive news about an event weeks or months after it happened and a response would take weeks or months. During the next eight or nine years until Jefferson becomes president, no significant progress is made in the pirate issue. The Muslim countries have no fear or respect for the United States. Under Jefferson, that will finally change.Kilmeade and Yaeger’s book should be required reading in middle and high schools. This is how history should be written. Their style is straightforward and thoroughly researched. I found it easy to read and completely riveting, even though it is history and I already knew the ending. The authors put human flesh on these legends which served to make me respect them even more. The description of Stephen Decatur’s brilliant decision to blow up the Philadelphia, an American ship that had been run aground in Tripoli Harbor and the execution of that plan is thrilling. Equally exciting is William Eaton’s 500-mile trek through the desert with US Marines and local mercenaries.I found a new appreciation for the patriotism and code of duty, honor and integrity that men of that period not only professed but lived. I would recommend you buy this book for yourself, read it, then lend it out to everyone you know or buy everyone their own copy. Encourage any children age 12 and older you know to read it. You will love it.
J**Y
An amazing untold story of Pirates and a Young Nation!
Thomas Jefferson and the Tripoli Pirates: The Forgotten War That Changed American HistoryThis is a very quick read but well worth the readers time. This book is just around 200 pages which I read in a few hours, but it took me much longer to look up all the places, ship designs and other details the authors described. This book is a foretelling of history that was doomed to be repeated over and over again. I literally couldn't put this book down and when I didn't have it in my hand I would be thinking about what happened. How I could consider that I have been formally educated and yet to have never heard the first word about this part of history is amazing. Other than the marine anthem with the words "from the shores of Tripoli" not a word have I heard about this conflict. This declared war was over shadowed perhaps by the Lewis and Clark Exposition or Thomas Jefferson himself. Having read about Jefferson from numerous books it seems almost impossible an impression wasn't made to me prior to reading this book regarding the Barbary Pirates of the Mediterranean.Having said all of this, I did have some confusion with all the different boats/ships the authors named during various confrontations. Most likely it was just my lack of understanding of navel vessels that caused by confusion. However, on occasions the authors would write that perhaps only one ship was present, then in the next reference the same characters were on another smaller boat. I don't know where the smaller boats came from, but again this is most likely more on me then the writers. Personally, I would also enjoy learning more about how a handful of marines crossed 500 miles of dessert and ended up with 500 or 600 fighters? Also, where did all the money come from to hire mercenaries? Did they carry money with them of that magnitude. Again, I do not wish to knock the authors on these trite matters as I truly loved the book. It's probably the first book in a while I actually didn't wish was so short.This appears to be our countries first venture into organizing coup's and it appears we have followed the same model every since. Promise and then short on delivery of those promises.I would highly recommend; the story reads like a novel with every page being unbelievable!
M**N
Historically inaccurate, terrible book
I have just started to read the first chapter and this book is terrible from an historical perspective. It focuses so much on US centered victimism that it leaves out other countries and nations that had been suffering piracy for longer and in worse conditions. Maps include Israel but claim piracy didn't reach Italy, Greece, Ireland and other countries that have documented pirate attacks from North Africa. The book is so biased against Islam it does not mention the differences between the concept of Islam in the 18th and 19th century compared with the 21st century. I then realized that obe of the authors is a Fox Channel presenter and the book has a quote recommending it from Donald Rumsfeld himself. This is so sad as there are few history books that try and explain this period in time. I live in Spain, in an area that suffered pirate attacks for almost 500 years. I recommend you buy a book that talks about the Barbary states and not how the United states saved some of their citizens. I recommend "The Barbary Coast" by John Wolf and "Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters" by Robert C Davis, both books were available on Amazon.
N**V
Speechless 👍
Truth is bitter than everythingMust read.. nice printing and light weight with perfect handling & pictures too
I**T
What excellent writing to make History come alive!
Fast paced and chalked full of information. These two authors are really good together in this series they ae doing.I recommend their other books;Washington's Spies and Andrew Jackson Battle of New Orleans
D**R
Good information
Very interesting book. Dealing with Muslims has not changed in two hundred years.
T**R
Gift
This was a gift it arrived a couple of days late but it was in good shape
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
4 days ago