ASUS ZenWiFi XT9 AX7800 Tri-Band WiFi6 Mesh WiFiSystem (2Pack), 802.11ax, up to 5700 sq ft & 6+ Rooms, AiMesh, Lifetime Free Internet Security, Parental Controls, 2.5G WAN Port, UNII 4, White

No es tan fácil de instalar directamente con la pc o laptop, me funciono mejor con uno solo conectado y usándolo como mesh, que usando los 2 como mesh, ya qué cuento con un router principal. El segundo, cuando lo instalaba, no distribuian bien el trabajo. Preferiría usar uno solo o tal vez los 2 pero 1 como router y el otro, como mesh.

Added in my existing Asus Zenwifi Mesh Wi-Fi system for basement. The signals are strong and the Internet connection is stable now.

Je le recommande facile à configurer

La señal del repetidor no conectado vía ethernet es mala y eso solo cuando logra establecer una conexión. Para el precio que pagas deberías de recibir mejor calidad de producto, mejor regreso a Deco.

I strongly do not recommend this product. I purchased the ASUS ZenWiFi XT9 expecting a high-end, security-focused mesh router. Instead, I encountered serious firmware, stability, and security failures that ultimately made the device unreliable and, at times, impossible to administer securely. Key issues in my experience: • Loss of secure (HTTPS) administrative access, including complete lockouts when HTTPS-only mode was enabled • Repeated management interface failures (ports 80/443 disabled, unstable fallback access) • Credential instability requiring repeated resets • Persistent Wi-Fi instability across devices • Inability to reliably factory-reset or recover the router once problems began A security router that cannot be securely administered is not fit for its ordinary purpose. What makes this especially concerning is that these problems appear to be latent firmware defects. They did not present themselves until the router was opened, configured, and firmware-updated — which means they cannot be detected without actually using the product. Return policy problem In my case, the product was not even opened until it was needed, only to discover these defects. Yet both ASUS and Amazon relied on a very short return window to deny a refund. Importantly, the product page did not clearly disclose any limited return period at the time of purchase. Even Amazon’s own assistant later confirmed that no specific return-policy section was displayed directly on the product page. Consumers should not be penalized for discovering serious defects only after a device is opened and configured — especially for networking equipment that may sit unused until deployment. ASUS support experience ASUS technical support acknowledged abnormal firmware behavior and potential backend issues, but ultimately offered repair-only RMA after the return window expired. That is not an adequate response for a product with recurring security-critical failures. This experience raises serious questions about ASUS’s willingness to stand behind its products in a reasonable, professional way. Recommendation Based on my experience, I would avoid this product and approach ASUS networking gear with caution. If you want a safer alternative, I recommend looking at **Netgear products such as the Nighthawk line. In my experience, Netgear routers have been far more stable, easier to recover if something goes wrong, and backed by more reasonable support and return practices. For a device that sits at the center of your home network and handles sensitive traffic, reliability, recoverability, and vendor integrity matter. Unfortunately, this product fell short on all three. (Disclaimer: I have no affiliation with any company mentioned here.)