Wireless in Ear Monitor System, True Stereo UHF IEM, in Ear Monitors for Musicians, Metal Stage Monitor w/ 89 Frequencies, Rack Mount, for Studio/Band (2 Bodypacks with Transmitter)

As a worship leader in a small church, the Phenyx Pro PTM-10 has been an absolute blessing for our setup. It delivers clear, reliable in-ear monitoring without unnecessary complexity or cost. The sound quality is clean and consistent, with plenty of headroom for vocals, acoustic instruments, and click tracks. For weekly services and rehearsals, it’s been rock solid—no dropouts, no distractions, just dependable performance that lets us focus on worship instead of tech issues. I’ve also had experience with the Phenyx Pro PTM-33, and while that system is great for larger teams or more complex stage setups, the PTM-10 is honestly the better fit for a small church. The PTM-33 offers more channels and expandability, but that can be overkill if you’re running a simple mono or stereo mix. The PTM-10 is easier to set up, quicker to train volunteers on, and more budget-friendly—without sacrificing sound quality. For churches with limited tech staff and smaller worship teams, simplicity matters, and the PTM-10 nails it. PTM-10 vs PTM-33 (from a small-church perspective): • Ease of use: PTM-10 is simpler and faster to deploy • Sound quality: Comparable and more than sufficient for worship settings • Cost efficiency: PTM-10 offers better value for smaller teams • Scalability: PTM-33 is better for large or multi-mix environments Overall, the Phenyx Pro PTM-10 has exceeded our expectations. If you’re a worship leader or church tech looking for a reliable, affordable in-ear monitor system that just works, this is an easy five stars and a confident recommendation.

The PTM-10 has everything you want in an In-Ear monitor at this price point that beats out its competition. included case, rackmount system, stereo and mono options, unit to pack syncing. It works in the 900 MHz realm with gets you out of the way of wireless mics and guitar units. so there is no crossover or interference there. you can run a single stereo mix or 2 mono mixes. So, technically 2 players can share 1 unit. This has everything but signal scanning which isnt a loss for this price point. you get it all and I didn't experience any dropouts or signal loss at all. there is a low hum when there is no audio coming thru the unit but it is inaudible once you have music coming thru. Excellent unit! go get one....

I am an electric bass player (5 string) and am not a professional musician by any stretch, but have had the pleasure of playing out at wineries, private events, and at my home church. I've played with groups as small as just me and an acoustic guitarist up to a full band with drums, keys, acoustic guitar, two electric guitars, and three vocalists. I have used stage monitors, wired in-ears, and wireless in-ears throughout the last few years of playing live. Like most musicians, I much prefer to use in-ear monitors so I can hear exactly what I need in order to play my part in the group. There is no question that wired is the most reliable connection and, typically, the best way to get full range audio into one's ears (depending on the range of audio the connected equipment can pass). However, wired in-ears may not always be the best solution for every circumstance. Once a musician begins to move around while playing, wireless monitoring starts to become the best way to hear what is needed. Enter the Phenyx Pro PTM-10. Packaging: The PTM-10 system came well packaged and was free of any damage. The system itself was nestled inside a nicely cushioned travel case. The travel case is not as robust as a Gator or SKB case, but more than adequate for a system at this price point. It is a nicety that it came with a travel case at all! The travel case with the system nestled inside was packed inside a fairly robust cardboard box decorated with Phenyx Pro labeling. That box was inside another plain box, which is what you see when it arrives to you. Well done on the packaging! System Components: I don't need to go into a lengthy description of every item inside the travel case since you can easily see that on the item listing. I will simply say that the fact Phenyx Pro included some ear buds and a rack mount tells me they care about the customer and want them to be able to get set up and using this system quickly without having to seek out extra accessories to make it work. Batteries were even included for the wireless receiver. Again, well done Phenyx Pro! Set Up: Set up of the PTM-10 system was very easy. Now, I've set up several other wireless in-ear systems over the years, so that bit of experience may have made this setup less intimidated without reading every word in the manual (plus, aren’t manly men NOT supposed to read manuals??). I did the responsible thing and consulted the manual in order to understand all the buttons, menus, and features. After a brief scan of the manual I was off and running. In my use case, I am routing out of an analogy Yamaha mixer via it’s Aux 1 and Aux 2 outputs (1/4” connections). I then have two 1/4" x XLR (male x male) cables that each plug into the back of the PTM-10’s left and right XLR inputs (Aux 1 is being used as the ‘left’ stereo channel with Aux 2 being used as the ‘right’ stereo channel). Note that the only two things I have coming into the mixer are a left and right (stereo) mix (1/4” left RCA and 1/4" right RCA coming from an external USB DAC from my computer and an XLR coming in from my Sansamp Bass DI. I then installed the included AA batteries into the wireless receiver and plugged in the transmitter to an available 120v outlet on my Furman power conditioner. I powered on the transmitter and powered up the wireless receiver. Next, I utilized the ‘set’ button on the transmitter to cycle through all the available menu options listed on the transmitter’s front screen. I made sure the system was set to ‘stereo’ and proceeded to set the unit to transmit on Group 6, Channel 1. After selecting that transmission channel, I pushed the ‘set’ button until I saw the transmitter’s screen indicate the sync motion. Once that began, I simply held up the wireless receiver to the transmitter’s screen and both units synced together. Very simple and effective! Use and Comments: I found the PTM-10 very pleasing to use. I used my Westone AM Pro 30 wired earbuds to test the unit. I use these regularly and am familiar with their audio characteristics. I commenced playing some music tracks from the connected PC and played along with my bass guitar. The frequency response of the PTM-10 is 60 Hz - 16 Khz. I thought maybe I would miss some of the low end of the bass. However, my bass sounded fantastic through the PTM-10! One could argue that the PTM-10 should be full spectrum, but the point of the system is for wireless monitoring. The sound quality was perfectly fine for that use. Even the low B string on my bass sounded great. Everything I needed to hear was present. I then took the unit to my church to test out while playing two Sunday services with the full band. At church there are several wireless microphones, wireless guitar systems, and wireless in-ear monitoring systems. There are also LED up lights and other LED stage lights. I hooked up everything and turned on the system. One thing the PTM-10 does not do is ‘auto scan’ the available frequencies to find a ‘clear’ frequency. I had to go through all the Groups and Channels to find the best one to use. Because my church has a lot of wireless already being used, I was only able to find two frequencies that worked well-enough to use. They were very clear most of the time, but every five to six minutes I would get a bunch of static that lasted for maybe 15 to 20 seconds. I never could figure out what was going on there, but it was not enough to make me unplug the system and go direct wired. Final Thoughts: I believe the PTM-10 is a fine product for the money. I have no hesitation in recommending it to anyone needing a wireless in-ear monitoring system that is on a budget. It is perfect, no. The frequency response is not full-range but is not intended to deliver pristine, high-quality audio. It is a monitoring system and is more than adequate to deliver what one needs to hear musicians and vocalists in order to play or sing along with accuracy. It is simple to use and the wireless syncing of the transmitter to the wireless receiver is a huge nicety. There was plenty of headroom, so volume was never an issue. I wish I knew where the random static/crackling came from while at church. I did not have that issue at home. If you cannot afford a digital wireless in-ear system, I highly recommend the PTM-10. Great job Phenyx Pro!

Let me start by saying that several months ago after they first came out I bought the PTM-33 Four Channel IEMs unit For my band. We are a techie band and are continually upgrading our equipment and technology. For purposes of this review I was using the Soundcraft UI 24 digital soundboard, Sennheiser XS wireless microphones, Multiple SM-58 microphones, and both wired and wireless bass and guitar connections. Also at the same time the four channel PTM-10 Wireless IEM system. We are a five piece band and previously we upgraded to the PTM–133 wireless IEMs from wired IEMs (you can see part of it in the picture) . As for us it is very important for each band member to have their own individual mix which they can adjust on the fly as needed not sharing a single “house” mix. I am the drummer and therefore stationary when I play LOL and so is the keyboardist so a wired connection was not a problem. However after reading the reviews and wanting to round out all wireless IEM’s for all band members, and have to deal with one less wire, I decided to buy this system so we are entirely wireless for IEMs. It is definitely a step up in that it’s stereo is a very nice addition. I tested it rehearsing with the band with multiple wireless microphones and four other wireless IEM units ( PTM-33) and Wireless Instrument connections and we had zero issues with connectivity, latency, sound quality, or drop out due to issues in the wireless spectrum. I was actually quite surprised as the environment we practice and also has quite a strong Internet Wi-Fi ( access point on ceiling above) and the soundboard which is the Soundcraft UI 24 has its own onboard Wi-Fi as well. We experienced no issues this was a very big positive. There are a ton more channels to choose from on this unit than the PTM-33 but I found I really didn’t need to mess with that much as I had a solid signal from the get-go. With regards to stereo versus mono I tested them both. Previously when we were wired we listened to a mono mix as the instruments are largely mono and we divide the keys and electronic drums Into two channels. We were simply panning everything in the middle to get an even mono mix with the other instruments divided however there was not much of a divide. Additionally with the arrays we play live with we find even splitting out vocals and panning the instruments gives us a different effect and can sometimes have phase shifting etc. That’s a little too much detail lol (But trying to help illustrate our setup) I tested it both with quarter inch TRS and XLR inputs And both in mono and stereo and could not discern a difference in cable type on either. Don’t get me wrong the stereo is awesome! You just need to be set up for it and used to it. My guess is unless you were actively touring you were probably working more in a mono world even everybody having their own mix is a bit sophisticated as well. However if you’re looking at a stereo type unit then you know what it is and what it brings to the sound. I’ve been working in mono world for a long time so stereo it was a very pleasant change but, would stress that people need to understand what getting a proper feed and stereo really means on the input. Stereo is awesome though :) The PTM-10 It is chock-full of features that the PTM–33 does not have. The individual balance is really cool you don’t have to do it on your mix which is handy having it on the body pack. The limiter and lock functions I tried but honestly don’t use. The lock function I don’t use as it is going to lock in a frequency and I don’t want to forget that it’s there in case I change frequencies on the fly. The limiter function seems interesting, However it’s really for loud playing and even though I’m a drummer I try not to crush my ears so I can’t say that I’ve fully realize the potential of that feature. However the future I do love the most is the EQ function. It is a simple on/off setting which I thought it would be an equalizer with various mhz bands however, but it’s an on/off.( you can see in a picture) I was a bit skeptical at first but I really like what it does to the tone. I don’t know how to better explain it then equating it to the magic button when editing a photo. It just makes the music sound better :-). In general it seems like the body pack has the same clip as the other unit, but the body pack itself is more substantial and feels a bit more solid. People have complained about the clips and other reviews I’ve read, yes they are a bit flimsy, we haven’t had any problems yet however we are largely not moving these too often they are kind of “permanently” clipped on the guitar and bass straps and the rest of us clip them on our belts at each session. Again if you were actively touring you would probably have the body packs in a small case as you see with any other professional band. Also I forgot to mention it comes in a nice padded custom fit case which is really nice. ( Included in a picture) I love when equipment comes with proper carrying cases. I haven’t had any trouble with either unit so I don’t have any experience with Tech Support with Phenyx Pro however I can tell you this is the second piece of equipment that I bought from them in the endeavor to get my band fully wireless it has not let us down. It does come with a one-year warranty so that will be there in the future should we need it. In summary it’s a great unit with awesome sound, lots of features, and plenty of channels to choose from. I’m always happy to answer any questions if you should have any.

I needed a wireless in-ear system quickly, and the main reason I chose this one was because I could not afford a proper Shure system (such as the PSM300 ) on short notice. I knew that a wireless IEM at such a low cost would have some drawbacks. In this case: 1. The audio quality is marginal -- it's not terrible, but it's definitely colored (by the way, I'm using Shure SE215 earphones, not the ones included with this system). I wasn't expecting high definition fidelity, but the sound from this unit isn't even close to flat; it's dull overall, slightly "crispy" toward the higher end of the spectrum, and I have this strange sense that the audio has a slight amount of "blurriness" to it. 2. The manual doesn't even come close to covering all of the options available in the body pack. I was able to figure out a few of them, while others I had no clue. Trial and error didn't reveal much, but I left it all where it seemed to sound the best (but I'd still like to know what's what!). 3. When the unit is in stereo mode, strange "digital-ish" noises waver in and out as you move. It's not loud, and you can still hear the audio fine, but the artifact is sometimes annoying. In mono mode, the artifact is gone. 4. The volume knob on the body pack is way underutilized -- with sound levels set appropriately at the input of the transmitter and on the transmitter itself, the body pack doesn't need to be turned up more than about 15-20% before it starts to get too loud. So, this isn't really a complaint since you can always get this system to be as loud as you want, but it's a technical flaw nonetheless. 5. The audio level meters in the front LCD of the transmitter don't seem accurate. You've got to get the input quite hot, and then turn the volume knob on the transmitter all the way up before you start to see much activity. At that point, you'll have to turn the volume on the body pack way down to keep from blasting yourself deaf. The point is that level meters are supposed to give an indication of how hot the input is so that you don't overload it and cause clipping or distortion. At "normal" levels, these don't hardly move at all, so they're pretty much useless. I'd bet that #1 and #3 are somehow related -- probably a poor implementation of an ADC in the transmitter, or DAC in the body pack, or both. I tried several different frequencies throughout its range, and the behavior remained the same. However, it's not all bad! 1. The battery life on the body pack is pretty good. I haven't used a whole lot of wireless IEMs to say whether the life is longer or shorter than most, but with quality batteries this one does last through a 4-hour gig just fine. 2. The range is FANTASTIC! I tested this system in my house before I brought it on stage, of course. I was able to walk more than 60 feet through the house, and eventually outside, and through all of those walls and obstructions there was never any difference in audio quality. I was quite impressed! 3. The ability to send configuration from the transmitter to the body pack via IR is pretty slick, and of the several times I've used it, it seems to work flawlessly every time. 4. I've used this in two live gigs now, and both times the system has proven to be reliable. Once I turn it on, it stays running consistently without any trouble whatsoever. Overall, this system does work, and it's a fair value. I will eventually spend the $700 for a proper Shure system, but until then, this will serve my needs well enough. And when that time comes, I'll be happy to keep this as a spare or a loaner. I toiled between giving three or four stars; I settled on three stars because audio quality is important to me, and I feel like this system is far under-par in that regard. If your needs are minimal and audio quality isn't important, or if you're a starving musician on a tight budget, this is a worthwhile investment.

I run an Amphitheater on the beach in South Florida and recently converted my stage over to all IEM. Running 5 shows a week, I had previously been running Sennheiser G3 systems, which worked well, however; these systems were in the 500mhz bandwidth which is extremely congested in my area so drop outs have plagued the system. (no antennae combiner 👎🏼). Figured I’d try the Phenyx Pro in 900mhz for the frequency, and cost. First of all the cost: Sennheiser systems are $1100, packs are $500. Replacing a busted pack when a careless musician drops or loses your pack isn’t fun. $225 for a system, and $69 for a Phenyx pack? Much easier to swallow. The pack is plastic, which kind of works in my favor considering I’m directly on the beach and the salt ait and humidity just disintegrates metal, so yeah…. Let’s try this thing. Ease of use: In my experience, Musicians don’t generally learn gear other than the instruments they play. So, ease of use is important here. Previously I would recommend the Shure systems to most as they are so much easier to configure than the Sennheiser which gets confusing and allows too many options which tend to result in issues when usees don’t understand what they’re changing. Not everyone wants to be a tech head, they wanna turn it on and go - maybe push a button every now and then to fix an issue, but menus and menus don’t do well with someone trying to concentrate on a performance. This Phenyx system is straight forward, select the frequency and go, very much like the Shure. Not a lot you can screw up here, and with the frequency range being 900mhz, much easier to find a free channel than the Sennheiser or Shure (both being in the 450-600mhz range). Frequency: 900mhz is far less congested than 450-600mhz, and for god sake please stop buying those 2.4ghz things….. Sound quality: On par with my Sennheiser G3, but without the interference so even better, flawless sound! I’ve done 4 shows with the PTM-10 so far this week and have questioned each musician who has used the pack and they’ve been so happy that two have purchased their own already. Range: I tested the pack out to front of house and was able to get signal 150’ back from the stage but there were drop outs at that point. As long as you have a clean frequency, range will not be an issue on stage and you’ll be safe going down into the audience a bit - you’ll most likely wanna pop them out anyway at that point but just in case you shouldn’t have issues within sight of the transmitter. Reliability…. In my case, I’m using this nightly and giving it to people who probably don’t care to be too careful since it’s not their gear so I’m worried about the antennae as it’s pretty flimsy and I can see it getting yanked out or broken off. So, I’ve opted to put two pieces of heat shrink to reinforce it a bit which I believe will help. It’s been dropped twice already, unscathed. Phenyx has a 1 year warranty though so I feel comfortable for the next year. I’ve found nothing negative about the PTM-10, nothing. It’s easier to use than the more expensive systems, it sounds just as good, and it has less flaws due to the frequency group (in my case / location). Hopefully Phenyx will release an IEM antennae combiner system, so I can have a rack of their IEM’s without worry!

I have been using both Shure PSM300 and Sennheiser G3 IEM systems for years now, each in the 500mhz Bandwidth but the interference has been driving me crazy. I gig 5 nights a week in a major city so available frequencies in that spectrum are tough. I’ve heard great things about the Phenyx IEM systems, saw that they were offered in 900mhz bandwidth and figured I’d try the PTM10 out and see if it would solve the issues I’ve been having with interference. I have now done 9 shows since receiving the unit and have had not one drop out or snap of interference. The 900mhz frequency spectrum seems to be the fix for my interference issues and is working well for me. I do have the ability to tune the PTM10 in the event I do have an issue, but so far it’s been perfect right out of the box. The sound quality is excellent, a little brighter than the Sennheiser or Shure systems, but I actually like the clarity the “air” gives the sound. Bottom end is great, mids are up front, and this top end makes me feel less “in my head” as in ears tend to do. We run audience mics to help with that anyway, and this top end just enhances that to where I don’t even feel like I’m using ears honestly. The price is incredible. The other brands are upwards of $1000, so to spend just over $200 on a stereo IEM system is outrageous. The pack is plastic and I do wish that Phenyx Pro would offer a metal pack option the way Shure does with the PSM300 system or the Sennheiser G3/4 systems. Or at the very least a removeable antennae. I take great care of my gear, so I don’t think I’ll have any issues myself - but would feel much better with a metal pack / removable antennae. Overall, I’m incredibly happy with this system and would highly recommend it to both seasoned musicians who have been using IEM’s and anyone looking to get into in ears - get in priced low with a great product…. You can’t go wrong with this system.

First off, for the money, this system sounds great. The quality of signal and sound is really good. So far, it actually maintains a connection with fewer drop-outs and less interference than the Shure system that I use at church. I am quite impressed with that. The transmitter seems to be sturdy enough, as it's metal. The receiver, however, is super cheap plastic. the antenna on the receiver is non-removable and also cheap, so it can be easily damaged and you cannot replace it. If something happens to the antenna, you would need a new receiver. Which is a problem, because as far as I can tell, Phenyx Pro does not sell the receiver pack separately. So if the receiver breaks, which is likely given how thin and flimsy the plastic housing is, you might be stuck with a non-functioning system. This could easily happen after one unfortunate drop of the receiver on a hard surface. So you might be better off buying the more expensive dual system with two receivers, and keep one tucked away as a spare. Unfortunately, that affects the the whole value proposition a bit. It comes with a nice plastic, foam-lined carrying case that is actually pretty decent quality, and a set of earphones. Those are pretty cheap and not great, but would do in a pinch as an emergency backup to a quality set. Overall, for the money, this is a good set. I would not tour with it - I don't think it would hold up. I have used it for a couple local shows and it has worked great, although I am leery about its long term durability. If you use it for shows, just be careful and have a backup plan. This set would excel as an IEM system for a rehearsal space, where you don't have to move or transport it a lot, or as an emergency backup to a more robust pro-audio system, like those made by Shure or Sennheiser.

si funcionan! si me gustaron, soy cantante y tienen excelente funcionamiento en escenario

El empaque muy bien es un plus que incluye su estuche, pero lo más importante es que funciona excelente una calidad de sonido sin queja el ruido de fondo es muy bajo casi imperceptible el volumen tiene mucho rango lo probé en stereo y funciona sin problema, solo lo he probado en casa pero con eso puedo decir que el equipo tiene un desempeño ideal ya que no sufrí pérdida de señal ni ruidos o interferencias incluyendo paredes , techo y caminando por el patio con el transmisor en el 2do piso, estuve probando con las pilas incluidas por alrededor de 2 horas y el indicador de batería seguía mostrando al 100%. Super Recomendado.

Excelente producto, sin duda buena inversión y excelente calidad/precio

Excelente producto ampliamente recomendado

Cumple con la función para lo que es, lo único que quiero es moverle la frecuencia porque tengo dos microfonos inalambricos más, entonces se genera interferencia, de manera que sí logro cambiarle de frecuencia al al receptor, pero al body pack no lo puedo enlazar a la frecuencia que le moví al receptor. Pero mientras no tenga interferencia todo excelente. Los audifonos que trae estan bien cumplen, ya es gusto de cada quien si desea ponerle otros de más calidad o más cómodos que se metan al oído.