Seiko Mens SNK355 Automatic Stainless Steel Dress Watch

Beautiful Rolex inspired design (with out the Rolex price) and made with Seiko quality, it's great value for the cost. I gave it three stars for accuracy because it spends most of the time on a watch winder, can't say about the water resistance either.

After doing a hefty bit of research (as it is kind of a sport for me) to find an inexpensive, reliable, respectable and very importantly stylish watch; I landed on the Seiko 5's. If I spent more than a few hundred dollars on a watch, I would be likely be to a conscious of it when active. So, not only is the 5 Shockproof, water resistant, day, date, and self winding...it's not bad to look at either. While reading a lot of reviews, some are unhappy about the size of the watch but here's my opinion on the matter. I remember when men's watches were a bit more smaller in design twenty years ago or so, and to wear one now would seem kind of feminine or dated on the wrist. However, I'm not down with the over-sized clocks people are wearing on their wrists either. They can be borderline comical to me to see this machine strapped to a wrist. This watch and another Seiko 5 I purchase a few months prior, are a perfect size for me. They are sporty and large enough to be masculine for active wear yet refined enough to segue to business or evening attire. Therefore, the size is and design of the watch balances masculinity with elegance...in my opinion.

Was wanting a cheap but reasonable looking watch in case of mugging. Does the job very happy with it

I have same problem , because the Watch desn,t work , I do not kwon what I have to do.

I've always loved Seiko watches and I'm happy to say that this one is no exception. The 7S26 revision C movement is quiet and accurate right out of the box. I've had the watch for three months and it's averaging a 3 second delay each day, which is great for a sub $100 automatic. The face is covered in Seiko 5 shields, but they are so lightly etched that I couldn't see them when I first looked (and I was looking for them). Unless you're looking at the face from the right angle in in the right light, it appears to have a brushed starburst finish. Overall the fit and finish is nice for the money and the lume is good although not applied in large quantities (Seiko has a strong reputation for great lume). I decided to replace the bracelet with a leather strap (the lug width is 18 mm). Though acceptable, the included bracelet is made of folded metal links. I was eventually able to re-size the bracelet myself, but it was needlessly difficult compared to other aftermarket bracelets I've worked with. As for the Hardlex crystal, I have another Seiko purchased in 2007, and I can vouch for its durability. My 2007 watch has slight scratches, but overall has held up really well with daily use. I expect the same from this watch. The watch is on the smaller side for a modern men's watch (approx. 37-38 mm), but works well with shirt cuffs and wouldn't be out of place in a business or business casual setting. I see it as more of a vintage style sports watch than a dress watch, but these days, you could get away with wearing it for most formal occasions. I find it shares a similar design aesthetics with the Rolex date just (only 36mm wide in the 1980's) with a little Seiko DNA thrown in for good measure (day/date, 4 o'clock crown). Overall, I wouldn't call it a luxury watch, but you get a lot for your money. As an everyday carry (EDC), or semi-dress watch, it fulfills its duties wonderfully providing classic Seiko/Rolex style, mechanical movement, and precision at a very reasonable price point.