TRENDnet5-Port 10G Switch, TEG-S750, 5 x 10G RJ-45 Ports, 100Gbps Switching Capacity, Supports 2.5G and 5G-Base-T Connections, Ethernet Splitter, NDAA & TAA Compliant, Lifetime Protection, Black

Since implementing this 10Gig switch into my 10Gig LAN it has worked great. Started 508MB pings at implementation and no loss. TRENDnet website states to only use cat6a, but specs for cat6 state it should work for under 150 feet. I went with cat6a since there is not a big difference in price and TRENDnet recommendation is to use cat6a. Gets a bit warm but expected for a five port 10Gig switch but it’s not bad. It is an American company and the switch is well built and has a good quality feel to it. Currently using three (all 10Gig connections) of the five ports. Works good so far.

I've been using TrendNet switches for a couple of years now. The new 10G switch is replacing a 2.5G switch in my office, I'm trying to future proof my setup. Immediately I could tell that throughput was faster and I measured ~30-40% throughput difference between the old and new switch. It does run a little hotter than the old switch but not that I can't touch it and not bad for being fanless. I also ran benchmarks on my machine and overall throughput and CPU is less. Super easy to set up, just plug it in and you Cat cables and you're rolling. I plan on buy another to replace a 2.5G in my main entertainment setup.

This switch works well, and is fanless, so it's quiet. The one complaint I have is that the power connector is an oddball size, which complicates things needlessly if you want to do something like power it with a PoE adapter or replace the power supply.

Just what I needed to extend my network. Normally a little warm but hot under load. Make sure you do not cover it up and you will love it,

UPDATE: Aside from the design flaw, it has now started to lose connection about once a day requiring you to cycle the power. It's really unstable. I don't know if it's a heat related issue because it feels very hot. AVOID. Really disappointed in this productThe switch has no way to disable it's poorly implement tree. The loop detection breaks operation with devices. I a mesh wireless network with backhaul. When you plugin the satellite mesh device it immediately thinks there's a loop and both the input signal port and the port for the mesh device are in operable. So, basically you can't use several devices with this switch due to this awful design.

While my ASUS GT-AXE16000 home router has 2 x 10 GbE ports, I actually needed a total of four 10 GbE ports + 1 uplink to the router. Plugging in my Synology NAS, my Plex server, my video editing desktop, and another NAS was never easier. Every port configured at 10 GbE and I have phenomenal speeds.I set the MTU for all devices to 9,000 to minimize overhead and maximize throughput. Here's the results transferring a 33 GB file from my video editing desktop to the Synology NAS.Before1 GbE (Plex): 119 MBps2.5 GbE (my desktop): 235 MBpsNow10 GbE (Plex): 985 MBps10 Gbe (my dekstop): 985 MBps10 GbE unRaid NAS: 985 MBpsCouldn't ask for better than that! Great job and great product.

Works great, just keep it plugged in and you're golden

Had this switch for 6 months during which it worked perfectly fine. Fast forward last week and I started having a completely crippling experience with the home network where I could not even work at all. I had to disconnect every single device from the network with the exception of the 2 work computers so we could at least do some work, and even then connection was so-so. I have a 2.5G connection so this was pathetic. I blamed the router and ISP because this is an unmanaged switch, should have been a no brainer. However, during troubleshooting with the ISP, I noticed that if I was connected directly to the modem, speeds were fine. Directly connected to the router, when the next hop was directly the modem, it was fine. The issue only occurred when the path was through this switch. I tested then connecting through a replacement TP-Link switch I have (which I don't recommend either since its ports tend to die as soon as there is any sort of power failure in the home) and while on the TP-Link I had downstream speeds of 2.3Gbps. On the TRENDnet I had 40 Mbps. Interestingly, upstream speeds were perfectly fine at 2.3Gbps. Seems that somehow the downstream direction got messed up on this switch for at least one of the ports. This also came out of nowhere, since there weren't any particular events (power outages, lightning, etc). it just stopped working all of a sudden. Furthermore, when I had the issue with TPLink, that company replaced the switch and also absorbed the cost of shipping back the failed unit and the new unit as well. In the case of TRENDnet, they want you to cover shipping to them, of course tracked and insured. If their switch is going to last 6 months, and they are not going to absorb the cost of shipping their failed hw back to the garbage pile, I have to say that it is a worthless brand for expensive equipment. I will leave TRENDnet just for 50-dollar gear or less. Something I'm not going to miss too much. If shipping of failed units was absorbed by them, I would maybe reconsider them, but if I have to spend at least 30 USD every 6 months, I would rather spend that in a switch that will last through that instead of having to replace it over and over