Maidenform womens Dream Boyshort Panty

I've always worn boyshorts and usually just went for the 6 pack of Hanes or Fruit of the Loom in the awful colors they came in because really it's underwear, and how good can underwear be? Apparently better than I knew - I got sick of my Hanes shorts losing their shape or falling apart after being worn and washed too many times and before I bought a pair of Maidenforms, I was actually wearing *gasp* men's boxer briefs for a spell, because they were cheap and better made than women's boyshorts, hipsters, whatever.Then I came to these, at $8 for a single pair they seemed like one of those items where they somehow convince you to buy a crap product- going entirely on the psychology behind paying more than you're used to but not paying an outrageous amount. Fortunately I was wrong.They do indeed fit like a dream, conforming perfectly to your shape, I wear a size 6 in underwear and these do not run large or small. The material is fantastic, I had half a mind to wander around telling people to feel how silky my underwear was (then I realized this would be odd). They don't ride up or slip down, they don't hang low or come up too high in front or in back, and they don't leave half your butt hanging out. Going to buy many more pairs as soon as I have the money.

I've been wearing an older version of these for years; that's how long they've held up (I always hang them to dry). It may have been an original version when boy-short panties came into vogue. That version had a narrow band of lace at both the waist and leg openings. I'm still using them, though the edge of the fabric to which the lace is stitched at the waist ravels a bit over time (from washing I assume) so I've cut off threads periodically. These obviously won't have that issue since there is no open fabric edge.This style from Maidenform never shoes panty lines and is extremely comfortable. I love the texture of the stretchy fabric. It feels positively luxurious ---and looks that way too. And it makes it easy to glide on any kind of pants or tights without making them ride up. With the lace trimmed style, sometimes under my running tights I have to smooth out that lace on the thighs (in the front) because it can roll up. That's kind of moot point, however, since Maidenform doesn't seem to make that style anymore. I also ordered a pair of these with a broad band of lace at the waist (only) and that is not an issue in case you want lace trim.

I typically purchase these at Kohl’s, but found a great deal on Amazon and with them arriving next day, I took my chances. I don’t regret it. The fit was perfect and exactly what I was expecting. I’ve ordered more since my first shipment and don’t foresee that changing as long as the price stays affordable and cheaper than the stores.

I just got a nice pair of black with blue polka dots & top lace from Under Moments.. fit was fabulous. This Navy pair in same size (as I’ve had before), does not fit right. The left thigh is nice & loose but the right is tight. I don’t understand. Awhile back I got 7’s (previous vendor) & they were the size I wore but were smaller than previous 7’s I had gotten before that. I can’t even wear them because they are smaller. So went to size 8. It’s really terrible. These were lower in price than the black pair I paid $13 for. I won’t be able to wear these. Guess you never know who has the right fit. I initially bought these in JCP.. & they weren’t as expensive as the $13 for 1 I just got.

I have a 32" waist, 37" hips, and weigh 145#. I normally wear a L/7. Maidenform's chart only goes down to small and says they are for waist size 36-37. Not a chance. I bought the large and they fit perfect. These are very comfortable. I have worn them while being active. They wick and moisture evaporates quickly. The sides are about 7 1/2" so they sit low, but not too low. They are just right that they should never pop out above your jeans. There is no "leg" to speak of on these. Many boyshorts have one to two inches of leg on them. These do not. I prefer 1/2-1" because I feel it keeps them in place better, but these still feel great. I will buy more.

These are my favorite panties now. I typically bought underwear from either costco (those bulk packages) or Victoria's Secret, but these so far are most comfortable to me. They don't give you the dreaded camel toe wedgie, but are also fairly smooth to wear under tight clothing. With thin fabric it might be noticeable, but due to wear the lines land (toward the bottom of the butt), it usually isn't a problem for me. The hem around the leg does seem to twist a little easy on the inner thigh, but it doesn't roll up other than that half-twist. To me, that isn't a problem at all, as it stays down when I'm wearing pants, but it is a little design quirk. They are a sort of spandex-y silky material, though definitely more structured than both. They feel like a substantial material that won't wear out easily.For reference: I'm hourglass-shaped and typically a size 6 in dresses.

there will be identical reviews. They're panties and pretty much the same as for as this sheer material goes.soft. why more men don't buy panties. I feel pretty, oh so pretty.... no wonder why more men don't wear panties, these will keep a man on edge all day and mind wondering to evening activities.Other than that.. These are soft, non-binding, or pinching. Men, these are pretty tru-fit, but helps if you know your panty size.how the heck do you find that out. experiment. but here's a guide.I wear a 28-30 men's brief. general rule.Which is about a size 6 panty. I have just learned, a 7 fits loose and somewhat baggy and gives no support, and my "guy" feels like its just bouncing, jiggling around down there. Which is why I don't like boxers. I like feeling a bit supported and snug.