Manufacturing Consent - Noam Chomsky and the Media

I very much appreciate the physical media of the documentary and the content in the documentary. The only problem with it is that depending where you live in the world, it might not work in certain Blu-ray players. It didn't work on my Xbox 360 or Xbox Series x, but it did work on a standalone Blu Ray Player. It mainly has to do with it working in region 2 compatible devices, even though I think it shouldn't really be an issue with the age we are living in now. Overall, loved the documentary, love that I have a hard copy, hate that region codes make it difficult for people not in region 2 to enjoy masterpieces such as this. If I wasn't lucky, I would have to get a region 2 Blu ray player.

This is more than a film, "Manufacturing Consent" has long been a tool of peace workers who wanted to inform others of the shameful U.S. policies toward countries like East Timor. This film's segment regarding the U.S. support of Indonesia's invasion of East Timor was used to raise awareness and galvanize support for the independence struggle that took place on that island nation, culminating in its becoming a member of the United Nations and a pair of East Timorese winning the Nobel Peace Prize.Beyond that, "Manufacturing Consent" has exposed the institutional flaws of a media that is owned and sponsored by corporate powers. This theme is further explored by the director, Mark Achbar, in his equally enlightening documentary The Corporation. In the several years since it was released, countless people have turned their media criticism into media participation, and have developed the sorts of alternatives that have been so desperately needed. Countless magazines, blogs, small publishing houses, documentaries and other media tools have created options that were not available in the past. Conferences on media reform attract thousands of people, such as the gathering hosted by "Free Press" each year. And books by radical democrats like Chomsky have become best-sellers 9-11, and are promoted by populist reformers like Hugo Chavez Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance (American Empire Project).Another reviewer expressed his wish that every American would see this film; and slowly but surely, a tipping point size of the population is either coming to know of Chomsky's work, or is coming upon the work of people who have been influenced by Noam's penetrating analysis - people like Robert McChesney The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the Twenty-First Century, Phyllis Bennis Challenging Empire: How People, Governments, and the UN Defy US Power, Robert Jensen Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity, Michael Moore Sicko (Special Edition), Paul Hawken Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Social Movement in History Is Restoring Grace, Justice, and Beauty to the World and so many others.For other Chomsky material, I'd recommend the books of his long-time collaborator, David Barsamian of "Alternative Radio" which has a large catalogue of Chomsky lectures, interviews, and debates with figures like Richard Pearl. What We Say Goes: Conversations on U.S. Power in a Changing World is the most recent collection of their dialogues. See also Z Magazine which has been publishing Chomsky articles and interviews for over two decades."At this stage of history, either one of two things is possible. Either the general population will take control of its own destiny and will concern itself with community interests, guided by values of solidarity and sympathy and concern for others, or, alternatively, there will be no destiny for anyone to control." - Noam Chomsky

This film from 1992 is an excellent introduction for Noam Chomsky's views for those unfamiliar (or only passingly familiar) with him, similar to the "Dummies" book series. The film is quite long at nearly 3 hours, but there is an intermission about half way through. There are also extended excerpts from two debates (my favorite is Chomsky dealing with Buckley's talking over him constantly) and an all-too-brief interview with Chomsky on the film from 2002. I say "all-too-brief" because this would have been an opportunity for Chomsky to update his thesis following the terrorist attacks on the US on 9/11/01 and the subsequent mobilization. One also wonders how he would characterize the Bush administration response to the attacks, but perhaps he was restrained given that the attacks occurred less than 6 months prior to the interview.Chomsky repeated claims he eschews "sound bites" in his interviews, but he actually sound bites quite well (a credit to the filmmakers' editing). He is seen mostly in clips for various talks and debates, some of the debates in a quite informal setting allowing for more pointed and specific remarks to be made. Chomsky's background is put in perspective well (early upbringing and influences as well as his linguistics work at MIT), but the core of the film is his thesis that the mass media is a tool to help form public opinion to allow the government to carry out specific policies that benefit an elite few.The film is not a Chomsky love-fest in that countering views are presented (in particular, the editor of the New York Times), though clearly the point of view of the film is that Chomsky is correct in his thesis. Two central examples of Chomsky's thesis are the comparison of media coverage between Cambodia and East Timor in the late 70's and the clear difference between defending someone's right to free speech without agreeing with the ideas proposed. What is most disturbing is Chomsky's discussion of how the media can marginalize those who even raise questions and in an eerie sense predicts the talking head shouting matches (laced with meaningless labels and rhetoric) that passes for "debate" today in the media.Chomsky's writings, though he claims they're for the large mass of people that the state would like to simply not participate in the political process, are usually too difficult for the average attention span today. This DVD provides a very watchable, clear introduction to Chomsky's ideas and may provide the motivation to go through his writings. For those who think Chomsky is a liberal (as he is often labled), listen to when he discusses Carter's policies in Timor, and recall Carter was the "human rights" president. Highly recommended, considering the present state of the media in the US. The world is far more complex than the views you get on TV and when you ask the question: "why do they hate us so", you need to remember that you may not even have all the information to answer the question.

You will find that many people dismiss this work, probably because it bothers them that they can't quite say it's incorrect and that paints a grim picture of the world they though they knew.This documentary of sorts does a great job of crystalizing the points and even some counter points to the accompanying book of the same name. Highly recommend as a use of your time, love it or hate it, you will be thinking about it long after.

I used it to demonstrate to some unsuspecting people, just how information and rhetoric as a whole can be manipulated to serve the interests of the politically and economically powerful.

Chomsky est un sociologue incontournable à la pensée rigoureuse. Ces écrits sont parfois durs à lire. Ce film explique très clairement ce que Chomsky dénonce dans le monde médiatique. Cela se laisse regarder sans voir le temps passé.Il est monté comme un film a suspens. On se laisse embarqué dans cette intrigue et on en sort plus intelligent.

Noam Chomsky ist weithin als Medientheoretiker bekannt, wobei mich seine politischen Schriften immer schon mehr fasziniert haben. Für mich wirkten die analysierten Medien stets als Werkzeug politischer Absicht - insofern ergänzen sich seine Werke ja auch sehr gut.Der Film selbst hat zwar ab und an Längen, ist aber sehr aufschlussreich. Er lässt Chomsky selbst überaus klug zu Wort kommen. Er führt uns vor Augen, wie das, was wir als Konsens zu wahrnehmen glauben, durch Inszenierung hergestellt wird. Darüber erfährt der Seher ansatzweise, wie schnell einem Kritiker dessen unter Zuhilfenahme einer Banalität das Wasser abgegraben wird.Neben seinen sehr empfehlenswerten Büchern sei auch dieser Film jedem kritischen Geist ans Herz gelegt!

A nice depthy look at the world of the media, and their huge influence on people's opinions and decisions. Chomsky goes rigorously though the New York times archives, and other newspapers, constructing what looks like a clear picture of how people's opinions are informed by TV and newspapers.Even the editor of the Times looks lost for words when Chomsky demonsrates how every single occurance of US supported attrocities in East Timor were whitewashed by the mainstream media. Not one time, or ten times, but thousands of times, every time.Although people like to shout 'conspiracy theory' at anything of this way of thinking, it is quite adeptly researched. As Chomsky remarks at one point in the film 'the mudslinger always wins.'No, there isn't a room of people deciding what goes out across national media, just a set of unwritten rules which you don't get very far in your career without. Any common sense can tell you that a journalist who criticises US foreign policy powerfully, (rightly or wrongly) the way some do, won't be very popular. On the other hand, one who does the same to official enemies, will be duely rewarded.There is no conspiracy, there is no paranoia, there is just what really happens, and how we can try to understand that in context of real power.Look at it with an open mind, and see the way that you look at the world change.

Wieviele Meinungen waren/sind meine Eigene? So gut wie keine einzige!Unbedingt anschauen (oder das Buch lesen).

This film is a must-see for anyone hoping to preserve, or restore rather, the America we all hold dear in our hearts. The methods of destroying true democracies have changed, if the reasons never do, and we need desperately to become more cognizant and wary of them.